The 5-Second Trick For case study breach contract business and corporate law in pakistan

The 5-Second Trick For case study breach contract business and corporate law in pakistan

Blog Article

We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or the information linked to over the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can generate inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.

Case legislation is specific to your jurisdiction in which it was rendered. For instance, a ruling in the California appellate court would not typically be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have heard the figured out counsel with the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as being the issues of the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(one) with the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession in the subjected premises to your petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to be decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer within the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this component for interim custody of the topic premises In the event the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.

This ruling has conditions, and Because the petitioners failed a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based on the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances in the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 in the Constitution. Read more

This is because transfer orders are typically viewed as within the administrative discretion of the employer. However, there could possibly be exceptions in cases where the transfer is determined by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They could have grounds to challenge before the suitable forum. Read more

The proposal is apparently reasonable and acceded to. Within the meantime police shall remain neutral from the private dispute between the parties, however, if any in the individuals is indulged in criminal activity the police shall take prompt action against them under law. five. The instant petition is disposed of in the above terms. Read more

PLR is really a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :

Many judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of the crime does not represent a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in putting the Petitioner's name over the ECL based over the criminal case are inconsistent with proven legal principles. Therefore, this petition must be allowed Read more

, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling over the same style of case.

Binding Precedent – A rule or principle recognized by a court, which other courts are obligated to observe.

In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative from the law laid down with the Supreme Court from the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. As a result, the competent authority of the parent department of your petitioner as well as Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount on the petitioner and pay out the pension amount and other ancillary benefits to your petitioner to which He's entitled under the regulation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority from the respondent is likewise directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of your petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more

These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and include all notable cases decided through the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.

Preceding four tax years interpreted. It's not necessarily from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, It is usually a well-set up proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that get more info evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings about the evidence.